Thanks to Bill W., we are going to receive an actors update that surpasses that of even our base package. As of right now, there will be an update that will include 8,103 actor images. I’m going to wait until the end of the week for any new submissions and then I may post it by Friday.
While compiling this update, there was a question that arose that I wanted to ask those of you that are downloading it. It can be a touchy subject and I don’t want to step into any areas that may involve legal ramifications, so I am going to simply post a poll and let you all make the decision for me.
Should nude images be allowed in the ImagesByName Project?
- Yes (55%, 63 Votes)
- No (45%, 51 Votes)
Total Voters: 114

Loading ...
You see, it would be naive (and false) to assume everyone that uses Media Browser and the ImagesByName packages is 18 years of age or older. That makes including nude images in any of the packages a cause for concern considering the popularity of the project. All it takes is for one aware parent/guardian to blow a whistle and cause us some problems.
Personally, it doesn’t bother me. I don’t have any films that would cause these images to be displayed and if I did, well, I probably wouldn’t be concerned to begin with. However, if they are going to be included, there will need to be disclaimers prompting for acceptance in place to allow for downloading them. I just need to find out if it’s worth the trouble.
So, please, voice your opinion in the poll above and I will see if it is something that can be maintained.