<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing metabrowser!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/</link>
	<description>The Home Theater PC Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-10612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehtpc.net/?p=297#comment-10612</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know...ask in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediabrowser.tv/forum/viewforum.php?f=9&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;meta&lt;browser/&gt; forum&lt;/a&gt; perhaps?  I have just always used standard movie name as my titles, so I never ran into anything like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>Browser: Google Chrome 4.0.249.89 OS: Windows 7<p>I don&#8217;t know&#8230;ask in the <a href="http://www.mediabrowser.tv/forum/viewforum.php?f=9" rel="nofollow">meta&lt;browser/&gt; forum</a> perhaps?  I have just always used standard movie name as my titles, so I never ran into anything like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-10606</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehtpc.net/?p=297#comment-10606</guid>
		<description>What if your titles have a year and movie type?

For example: Aladdin 1992 DVD

I&#039;ve configured MB options to state I use this format, but it will not parse the title and find my movie. I have to manually remove 1992 DVD for it to work.

Any advice please? We&#039;re talking over 100 titles here.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>Browser: Firefox 3.5.8 OS: Windows XP<p>What if your titles have a year and movie type?</p>
<p>For example: Aladdin 1992 DVD</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve configured MB options to state I use this format, but it will not parse the title and find my movie. I have to manually remove 1992 DVD for it to work.</p>
<p>Any advice please? We&#8217;re talking over 100 titles here.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-892</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehtpc.net/?p=297#comment-892</guid>
		<description>You must not know how to use MetaBrowser.  I don&#039;t know what negative impact having a ProgramData folder would have other than it holds config files and cached results (MediaScout does this also, it just doesn&#039;t have an install location).  I also have never updated any movies using my HTPCs.  I use MetaBrowser on my regular PCs and laptops just as I do SMO and MediaScout.

Considering SMO does not include MPAA ratings, actor editing, or backdrop selections, I don&#039;t really know what advantage you&#039;re speaking of.  I still use them all though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>Browser: Firefox 3.0.6 OS: Windows Vista<p>You must not know how to use MetaBrowser.  I don&#8217;t know what negative impact having a ProgramData folder would have other than it holds config files and cached results (MediaScout does this also, it just doesn&#8217;t have an install location).  I also have never updated any movies using my HTPCs.  I use MetaBrowser on my regular PCs and laptops just as I do SMO and MediaScout.</p>
<p>Considering SMO does not include MPAA ratings, actor editing, or backdrop selections, I don&#8217;t really know what advantage you&#8217;re speaking of.  I still use them all though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roma0803</title>
		<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>roma0803</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehtpc.net/?p=297#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Nice. But it will not replace SMO for me. The good thing about SMO is it doesn&#039;t need a program folder in ProgramData. With SMO I can update and add metadata to my movies over the network. I don&#039;t need to do this from my HTPC, which only functions as a HTPC. I can work from my laptop, select the movies folder from my network and update the movie info.

Both MediaScout and SMO have this advantage over MetaBrowser, to me (and I know to a lot of others) this is a very big advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>Browser: Internet Explorer 8.0 (Compatibility Mode) OS: Windows Vista<p>Nice. But it will not replace SMO for me. The good thing about SMO is it doesn&#8217;t need a program folder in ProgramData. With SMO I can update and add metadata to my movies over the network. I don&#8217;t need to do this from my HTPC, which only functions as a HTPC. I can work from my laptop, select the movies folder from my network and update the movie info.</p>
<p>Both MediaScout and SMO have this advantage over MetaBrowser, to me (and I know to a lot of others) this is a very big advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehtpc.net/?p=297#comment-739</guid>
		<description>I added an additional comments button for the bottom, so there is one in both locations.  You were right, it didn&#039;t make much sense to have to scroll up in order to post after reading.  Thanks for the heads up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>Browser: Firefox 3.0.5 OS: Windows XP<p>I added an additional comments button for the bottom, so there is one in both locations.  You were right, it didn&#8217;t make much sense to have to scroll up in order to post after reading.  Thanks for the heads up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehtpc.net/?p=297#comment-735</guid>
		<description>From what I have heard, there will be a beta release tomorrow (Monday), so I would keep an eye out here or in the thread at the Media Browser forums.  I&#039;ll look into the comment button.  To be honest, I have no idea what it looks like to make a comment!  But if it&#039;s in an awkward position, I&#039;ll take your word for it since you guys are the ones that would know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>Browser: Firefox 3.0.5 OS: Windows Vista<p>From what I have heard, there will be a beta release tomorrow (Monday), so I would keep an eye out here or in the thread at the Media Browser forums.  I&#8217;ll look into the comment button.  To be honest, I have no idea what it looks like to make a comment!  But if it&#8217;s in an awkward position, I&#8217;ll take your word for it since you guys are the ones that would know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://www.thehtpc.net/htpc/introducing-metabrowser/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehtpc.net/?p=297#comment-731</guid>
		<description>Hey Jon,

  This looks great, any idea when its coming out? Also, this blog design makes it a bit tedious to use comments. I suggest moving the comments button to the bottom of the post as well. Its just what users expect. Still looking good though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>Browser: Google Chrome 1.0.154.46 OS: Windows 7<p>Hey Jon,</p>
<p>  This looks great, any idea when its coming out? Also, this blog design makes it a bit tedious to use comments. I suggest moving the comments button to the bottom of the post as well. Its just what users expect. Still looking good though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
